Page 35 - Gateways for Early Educators
P. 35

                                         Gateways for Early Educators
Site Visits 61.1% 50.0% 97.9% 88.2% 60.4% 46.8% 11.4% 64.4%
Telephone 11.1% 0.0% 1.4% 5.9% 14.2% 17.1% 0.0% 8.6%
Email 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%
NotReported 2.8% 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 2.7% 8.6% 2.3%
2016
     Table 9a. Percent of Coaching in Each Modality Per Resource and Referral Agency- Career Goal Development Plan
     CCRC Connections
         Crystal MAOF Options Pathways PUSD Stairs
       Los Angeles County
       Office Visits 24.1% 30.0%
         0.0% 5.9% 17.0% 32.4% 80.0%
       21.6%
       Group Coaching
0.0% 4.0%
         0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
       0.3%
       Other 0.9% 12.0%
         0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0%
       2.6%
     Table 9b. Percent of Coaching in Each Modality Per Resource and Referral Agency- Career Goal Development Plan Follow-Up Sessions
      CCRC Connections
             Crystal MAOF Options Pathways PUSD Stairs
            Los Angeles County
  Site Visits
Telephone
Email
Not Reported
43.1% 57.9% 85.4% 79.2%
38.0% 12.4% 5.8% 12.2%
5.9% 12.9% 1.4% 0.6%
0.8% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
58.2% 57.0% 18.0% 54.5%
10.9% 18.0% 0.1% 14.5%
1.9% 0.4% 0.2% 3.3%
0.9% 1.3% 0.2% 0.7%
     Office Visits 8.1% 6.9%
           0.8% 2.9% 12.4% 20.9% 81.4%
        21.2%
      Group Coaching
0.2% 0.1%
           2.3% 3.2% 0.3% 0.6% 0.0%
        0.8%
      Other 3.9% 9.2%
           3.7% 1.3% 15.5% 1.9% 0.0%
        5.1%
  Research Question 4: What areas of coaching are participants targeting?
Coaches worked closely with the participant to develop goals based on participant interest and observations of the Coach. These goals were documented on the coaching form and then entered into the database.
The number and percent of goals in each of the quality goal areas (Learning Environments, Adult-Child Interactions, and Special Needs and Inclusion) and the career development areas (Career and Professional Development, Marketing Development, Personal Development, Educational Development, Other) are presented in Table 10. Last year’s evaluation reported a
25

















































   33   34   35   36   37